Steven Miller v. Albert Najera
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202121-15202California437 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN RAY MILLER, No. 21-15202
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01077-AWI-
BAM
v.
ALBERT NAJERA; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Steven Ray Miller appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and
state law that occurred while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.…