Steven Miller v. Albert Najera

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN RAY MILLER, No. 20-17348

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00234-DAD-JDP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALBERT NAJERA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Steven Ray Miller appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and

state law that occurred while he was a pretrial detainee. We review for an abuse of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). discretion a dismissal of an action as…