Robert Emery, Jr. v. Mark Nooth
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
DEC 20 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT LEE EMERY, Jr., No. 21-35278
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02096-MC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARK NOOTH, Eastside Institutions Administrator, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC); et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Oregon state prisoner Robert Lee Emery, Jr., appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d…