Randy Hoge, Jr. v. S. Griffith

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202120-35705California386 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY L. HOGE, Jr., No. 20-35705

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-00638-JR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

S. GRIFFITH, A#249,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Randy L. Hoge, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing with prejudice his civil rights action for failure to comply with a court

order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Pagtalunan v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.