Kevin Rindlisbacher v. Steinway, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202120-17331California1,293 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN H. RINDLISBACHER, husband; et Nos. 20-17331 al., 21-16085

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01131-MTL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STEINWAY, INC., DBA Steinway & Sons, a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Kevin and Jami Rindlisbacher and Piano Showroom of Arizona, Inc.

(collectively, “Rindlisbacher”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary

judgment to Steinway, Inc. (“Steinway”) on Rindlisbacher’s claim for constructive

fraud. Rindlisbacher also appeals the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Steinway. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.