Karen Isaacson v. Marcia Fudge

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202120-35442California289 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN MARIE ISAACSON, No. 20-35442

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00588-RAJ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARCIA L. FUDGE, Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Karen Marie Isaacson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing for lack of standing her action alleging claims related to a Department

of Housing and Urban Development rule. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review de novo. Gingery v. City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.