Jose Ascencion-Castro v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202119-71400California452 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ASCENCION-CASTRO, AKA Jose No. 19-71400 Acesion-Castro, AKA Christian Ronald Clegg, Agency No. A202-014-952

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Ascencion-Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to remand

and his motion to terminate, and dismissing his appeal from an immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion for a continuance. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.