James Knochel v. Amy Fackrell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202120-17326California345 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES JOSEPH KNOCHEL, No. 20-17326

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-08086-GMS-JZB

and

EMILY NOELLE MIHAYLO, MEMORANDUM*

Petitioner,

v.

AMY FACKRELL; JOHN C. MORRIS;

UNKOWN PARTY, named as Medical Director - West Yavapai Guidance Clinic;

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE

OF ARIZONA,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

James Joseph Knochel appeals pro se from the district court’s order

designating him a vexatious litigant and imposing pre-filing restrictions against

him. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.