Francisco Pimentel-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202119-72247California600 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO PIMENTEL-HERNANDEZ, No. 19-72247 AKA Fransico Adelma, AKA Ramon Ortega Rodriguez, AKA Ramon Rodriguez-Ortega, Agency No. A099-063-199

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Pimentel-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his request for a continuance

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.