Dian Qin v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202115-72342California936 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIAN QIN, No. 15-72342

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-273-501

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 22, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Dian Qin, a citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the denial of her claims for asylum and

withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act and relief under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). “We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252,” Wang v. Sessions, 861 F.3d 1003, 1007 (9th Cir. 2017), and deny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.