Bruce Committe v. Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE EDWARD COMMITTE, No. 21-35161

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01013-AA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP;

P. K. RUNKLES-PEARSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Bruce Edward Committe appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his employment action alleging retaliation in violation of the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112…