Aaron Van Neubarth v. Collete Peters

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202120-35539California539 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AARON VAN NEUBARTH, No. 20-35539

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:18-cv-01730-AC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COLLETE PETERS; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon John V. Acosta, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted December 14, 2021***

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Aaron Van Neubarth appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.