Singman

Singman v. IMDB.com, Inc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 2021B307783California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 12/20/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

BRUCE H. SINGMAN, B307783

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20SMCV00748 v.

IMDB.COM, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elaine W. Mandel, Judge. Affirmed.

Bruce H. Singman, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hueston Hennigan, Moez M. Kaba, Joseph A. Reiter and Eunice Leong for Defendant and Respondent.

____________________ Attorney Bruce H. Singman sued and lost in the trial court. Serving as his own attorney, he appeals his defeat. His brief on appeal—there is only one, for he filed no reply—contains a table of authorities. That table has one entry. That entry is section 904.1, subdivision (a)(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which authorizes appeals from judgments. This section does not impeach the trial court result. No other legal citations appear in this brief. We presume the trial court result is correct. (Jameson v. Desta (2018) 5 Cal.5th 594, 608–609.) The one contesting that result thus bears the burden…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.