Taylor

United States v. Taylor

Good Law
887 F.2d 1090·1989 WL 123641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 2, 198936-3_2California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

887 F.2d 1090 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin Leroi TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-3183. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 12, 1989. * Decided Oct. 2, 1989. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, ALARCON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marvin Leroi Taylor appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress a quantity of crack cocaine found in a jacket he was wearing. After the court denied his motion to suppress, Taylor entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. We affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's findings that Taylor freely and voluntarily consented to a search and that the search conducted remained within the bounds of the consent. United States v. Gomez, 846 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Sierra-Hernandez, 581 F.2d 760, 764 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.