Vinson Johnson v. David Shinn

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINSON TREMAYNE JOHNSON, No. 21-15954

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00080-GMS-JZB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of the A.D.O.C.R.R. at Central Office; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Vinson Tremayne Johnson, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from

the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due

process claims arising from a disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…