United States v. Thomas Schopp

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-30232California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30232

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:15-cr-00001-TMB-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

THOMAS SCHOPP, AKA Thomas Hiser,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Schopp appeals from the district court’s amended judgment and

challenges the 45-year sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing following

his guilty-plea conviction for production of child pornography, in violation of

U.S.C. § 2251(a). We dismiss.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Schopp contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. As the

government…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.