United States v. Keith Rose

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202117-16769California762 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 21 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-16769

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:16-cv-00916-LJO 1:07-cr-00156-LJO-4 v.

KEITH ROSE, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 8, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: BEA and LEE, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

After participating in a series of armed robberies, Keith Rose pled guilty to

one count of conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1951, and one count of brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.