United States v. Gregory Young, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202121-10059California421 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10059

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01217-ROS-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GREGORY THOMAS YOUNG, Jr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Thomas Young, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order revoking

supervised release for the second time and imposing a 24-month sentence. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Young contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to: make

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). an individualized determination of his sentence, use the Sentencing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.