United States v. Cemone Lewis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202121-15592California239 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-15592

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:20-cv-01073-APG v. 2:18-cr-00055-APG-GWF-

CEMONE CHAMPAGNE LEWIS,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Cemone Champagne Lewis appeals from the district court’s judgment

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lewis’s counsel has filed a

brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.