Tania Reza-Paniagua v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-71916California593 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TANIA REZA-PANIAGUA; et al., No. 20-71916

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A209-388-613

A209-388-614

v. A209-388-615

A209-388-616

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 10, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Tania Reza-Paniagua and her three minor daughters seek asylum in the United

States, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention against Torture

(CAT). The parties are familiar with the facts, and so we do not recount them here.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Because the Board of Immigration Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.