Rodrigo Naveda-Mena v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202119-73200California672 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

RODRIGO SALVADOR NAVEDA- No. 19-73200

MENA,

Agency No. A205-147-891 Petitioner,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, WATFORD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Rodrigo Naveda-Mena, a citizen and native of Mexico, petitions for review

of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal

from an order of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for

voluntary departure as a matter of discretion. Although we generally lack

jurisdiction to review the agency’s decision to deny voluntary departure, see

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). 8 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.