Randy Hoge, Jr. v. Duane Frieze

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-35710California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

RANDY L. HOGE, Jr., No. 20-35710

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-00244-JR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SUSEE, Deputy; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Randy L. Hoge, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing with prejudice his civil rights action for failure to comply with a court

order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion a dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.