Randy Hoge, Jr. v. Duane Frieze
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-35710California324 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RANDY L. HOGE, Jr., No. 20-35710
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-00244-JR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SUSEE, Deputy; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Randy L. Hoge, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing with prejudice his civil rights action for failure to comply with a court
order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of
discretion a dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d…