Patricia Morrison v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202121-15277California334 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICIA HARDING MORRISON, No. 21-15277

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01207-RFB-BNW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Patricia Harding Morrison appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying her post-judgment motion to reopen her diversity action. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch.

Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.