Nat'l Elev. Ind. Pension Fund v. Flex Ltd.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY No. 21-15050 PENSION FUND, Lead Plaintiff, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-02706-LHK Plaintiff-Appellant,
and MEMORANDUM*
DAVID KIPLING; BRISTOL COUNTY
RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FLEX LTD.; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 8, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
National Elevator Industry Pension Fund (National Elevator) appeals the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. dismissal of its class action claims against Flex Ltd. (Flex). National Elevator
alleges that Flex and its officers gave false and misleading information about its
project with Nike and, thus, violated §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange