Michael Hakim v. Federal Insurance Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-55423California373 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL HAKIM, No. 20-55423
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04219-VAP-SS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Michael Hakim appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment
in his diversity action arising out of Hakim’s homeowners’ insurance claim. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the
district court’s denial of an extension of time under Federal Rule of Civil
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Procedure 6(b). Ahanchian v. Xenon…