Michael Hakim v. Federal Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-55423California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL HAKIM, No. 20-55423

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04219-VAP-SS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Michael Hakim appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his diversity action arising out of Hakim’s homeowners’ insurance claim. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the

district court’s denial of an extension of time under Federal Rule of Civil

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Procedure 6(b). Ahanchian v. Xenon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.