George Huffman v. Stanley Sniff
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-56010California447 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE DAVID HUFFMAN, No. 20-56010
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:17-cv-01197-JLS-MRW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STANLEY L. SNIFF, Riverside County Sheriff, in individual and official capacity, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
California pretrial detainee George David Huffman appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v.…