Ernest Hicks v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-36029California321 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNEST CLARK HICKS, No. 20-36029

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00158-SAB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign (non-Washington incorporated) banking institution; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP OF

WASHINGTON, a Washington corporation;

DOES, 1-10,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley A. Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Ernest Clark Hicks appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action alleging various federal and state law claims regarding a home loan. We

have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.