Bop

Dionte Houff v. Bop

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202121-55037California403 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIONTE HOUFF, AKA Bird, AKA No. 21-55037 Birdman, AKA Tay, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-00645-SB-AFM Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; MEMORANDUM*

FELIPE MARTINEZ,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Dionte Houff appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition, which challenged a

prison disciplinary proceeding in which he was sanctioned with the loss of good

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). conduct time credits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.