Amzn

Ayse Sen v. Amzn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202120-55857California415 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AYSE SEN, No. 20-55857

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-01486-JAH-JLB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMAZON.COM, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Ayse Sen appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her

action alleging Lanham Act and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Surfvivor Media, Inc. v. Survivor Prods., 406

F.3d 625, 630 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly granted summary judgment on Sen’s Lanham Act

claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.