Anthony Barbieri v. Timeshare Liquidators LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202121-15644California325 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY RUBEN ALDO BARBIERI, No. 21-15644
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00355-JAD-EJY
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TIMESHARE LIQUIDATORS LLC; STAN
MULLIS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Anthony Ruben Aldo Barbieri appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment dismissing his Title VII employment discrimination action. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for plain error the district judge’s
decision not to recuse. United States v. Spangle, 626 F.3d 488, 495 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2010). We affirm.