Anthony Barbieri v. Timeshare Liquidators LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 202121-15644California325 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY RUBEN ALDO BARBIERI, No. 21-15644

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00355-JAD-EJY

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TIMESHARE LIQUIDATORS LLC; STAN

MULLIS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Anthony Ruben Aldo Barbieri appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his Title VII employment discrimination action. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for plain error the district judge’s

decision not to recuse. United States v. Spangle, 626 F.3d 488, 495 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2010). We affirm.

In his opening…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.