Pilibos

Pilibos v. Pilibos CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 2021F082952California19,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

Snauffer, J.

Filed 12/21/21 Pilibos v. Pilibos CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SARAH PILIBOS, as Attorney-in-Fact, etc.,

F082952

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 20CEFL02455) v.

ALEXANDER PILIBOS, OPINION Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Rosemary T. McGuire, Judge. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Scott M. Reddie, Jerry D. Casheros, and Jessica M. Boujikian, for Appellant. Whitney, Thompson & Jeffcoach, Timothy L. Thompson and Nikole E. Cunningham, for Respondent. -ooOoo- This case involves a restraining order issued under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Prevention Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600, et seq.). The Fresno County Superior Court issued a restraining order against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.