In re Criado CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2021F083263California720 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/21/21 In re Criado CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re F083263

EDDIE CRIADO, (Merced Super. Ct. Nos. 18JP-00185-A, 18JP-00185-B) On Habeas Corpus.

OPINION

THE COURT*

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Eddie Criado, in pro. per., for Petitioner. Forrest W. Hansen, Merced County Counsel, and Jennifer Trimble, Chief Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Levy, Acting P. J., Peña, J. and Meehan, J. On July 7, 2020, petitioner Eddie Criado’s parental rights were terminated in the Merced County Superior Court. Petitioner now seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal. The Attorney General was given an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.