Jesus Ramirez-Medina v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Opinion
Hurwitz, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESUS RAMIREZ-MEDINA, AKA No. 16-73325 Javier Gonzalez, Petitioner, Agency No.
A079-811-177
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted November 18, 2021 Pasadena, California
Filed December 22, 2021
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges, and Stephen R. Bough, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Hurwitz
* The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation. RAMIREZ-MEDINA V. GARLAND
SUMMARY **
Immigration
Denying Jesus Ramirez-Medina’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that the phrase “an offense” in the cancellation of removal statute at 8 U.S.C § 1229b(b)(1)(C) includes the “[m]ultiple criminal convictions” described in § 1182(a)(2)(B).
Under 8 U.S.C § 1229b(b)(1)(C), an alien who has been “been convicted of an offense under [8 U.S.C.] section 1182(a)(2),…