People v. Carrasco CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2021D078123California1,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The following summary is from the relevant portion of the facts from our prior opinion, People v. Carrasco, supra, D054174. “1. The People’s Evidence “a. The June 22, 2007 Shootings “On June 22, 2007, [K.L.] was in a car in an alley. [K.L.] saw four men in the alley, one of whom was yelling at a fifth man. According to [K.L.] , one of the men from the group of four struck the fifth man in the head with a bottle. [K.L.] ducked down in the car. Shortly thereafter, she heard two gunshots. “A second witness, [I.S.], identified Carrasco in court as having been present in the alley during the June 22 shootings. [I.S.] also testified that she had previously identified [Jose] Nogales from a series of photographs as having been present in the alley and having fled the scene with a black gun tucked in his waistband. Carrasco’s DNA was discovered on a bottle found at the scene of the June 22 shootings. Cartridge cases that matched the gun used in the murders charged in counts 3 and 4 were found at the scene of the June 22 shootings. “b. The July 8, 2007 Murders “Just after midnight on July 8, 2007, several members of the Perez family and their friends were standing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.