Hill

Hill v. Law Offices of Beatrice L. Snider CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2021D076958California7,012 words

Opinion

Opinion

Guerrero, J.

Filed 12/21/21 Hill v. Law Offices of Beatrice L. Snider CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CARLA HILL, D076958

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015- 00014603-CU-PN-CTL)

LAW OFFICES OF BEATRICE L.

SNIDER, APC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kenneth J. Medel, Judge. Affirmed. Carla Hill, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Klinedinst, Heather L. Rosing, Leah A. Plaskin Lorenz, and Robert M. Shaughnessy, for Defendant and Respondent. Carla Hill sued her former attorneys, the Law Offices of Beatrice L. Snider, APC (LOBS), after that firm represented her in postjudgment family law proceedings. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.