Vladimir Gagic v. County of Maricopa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202121-15857California770 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VLADIMIR GAGIC, No. 21-15857

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00037-MTL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF MARICOPA; JOY RICH,

Maricopa County Manager, in her official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 7, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and BENCIVENGO,*** District Judge.

Vladimir Gagic appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. complaint without leave to amend. Gagic brought…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.