United States v. Douglas Gosnell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202121-30113California386 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30113

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00009-DLC-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DOUGLAS JAMES GOSNELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Douglas James Gosnell appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gosnell contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). consider his mitigating arguments and the 18 U.S.C § 3583(e) factors, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.