United States v. Douglas Gosnell
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202121-30113California386 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30113
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00009-DLC-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DOUGLAS JAMES GOSNELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Douglas James Gosnell appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gosnell contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). consider his mitigating arguments and the 18 U.S.C § 3583(e) factors, and…