United States v. David Hensel

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30089

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:93-cr-00196-RSL-

v.

DAVID MICHAEL HENSEL, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

David Michael Hensel appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his “Motion for Relief from Restitution and Expired Judgment Lien.” We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court correctly concluded that Hensel’s motion was barred by

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). claim preclusion because he brought the same claim…