Sedfrey Linsangan v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202120-17024California865 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEDFREY M. LINSANGAN, No. 20-17024

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00145

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam Frances Tydingco-Gatewood, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 21, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Sedfrey Linsangan appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of the United States of America. The facts are known to the

parties, so we repeat them only as necessary.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). I

Summary judgment was proper in rejecting Linsangan’s claim that Section

12616 of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) exceeded the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.