Randy Geren v. R. Fisher

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202121-15036California466 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY JAMES GEREN, No. 21-15036

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01662-DAD-SAB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

R. FISHER, Warden, V.S.P.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Randy James Geren appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). state a claim. Wilhelm v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.