Lanalsikov Lowe v. Russel Heisner

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202120-56057California547 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LANALSIKOV LOWE, AKA Lanalsikou No. 20-56057 Lowe, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01808-MWF-E Petitioner-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM**

RUSSELL HEISNER*, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021***

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Lanalsikov Lowe appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

* Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Warden Russell Heisner is substituted as Respondent. ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.