Hamid Hejazi v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202120-35248California369 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 22 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, No. 20-35248

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-00116-HZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Hamid Michael Hejazi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims for failure to pay the

filing fee after the district court denied his application to proceed in forma

pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of discretion the denial of leave to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.