Hamid Hejazi v. Oregon Supreme Court
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
DEC 22 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, No. 20-35151
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:19-cv-01667-HZ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
OREGON SUPREME COURT, public entity; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Hamid Michael Hejazi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims for failure to pay the
filing fee after the district court denied his application to proceed in forma
pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of discretion the denial of leave to proceed in…