Foster Taft v. Ventura County Medical Center

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202121-55216California467 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 23 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FOSTER TAFT, No. 21-55216

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-07856-MWF-E v.

VENTURA COUNTY MEDICAL MEMORANDUM*

CENTER; CAROL LASHBROOK,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 7, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and BENCIVENGO,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. Foster Taft appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his

complaint without leave to amend. Taft brought suit under 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.