Sinkiewicz

Sinkiewicz v. Skyline 83 Batavia Investors CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2021A157192California2,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 12/23/21 Sinkiewicz v. Skyline 83 Batavia Investors CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THOMAS E. SINKIEWICZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.

SKYLINE 83 BATAVIA A157192

INVESTORS, INC.,

(San Francisco County Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. CGC-17-561619)

The plaintiffs in this case, Thomas E. Sinkiewicz and Gayle A. Sinkiewicz, bought commercial real property and then sued the seller, Skyline 83 Batavia Investors, Inc. (Skyline), alleging that the property listing had significantly overstated the property’s size. The trial court granted Skyline’s motion for summary judgment, and plaintiffs now appeal. The issue before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying plaintiffs’ request for leave…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.