People v. Romero CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2021H047034California12,855 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/23/21 P. v. Romero CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H047034

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. C1777217)

v.

JULIAN DANIEL ROMERO,

Defendant and Appellant. Defendant Julian Daniel Romero was convicted by a jury of three counts of aggravated sexual assault on a child under 14 (Pen. Code, § 269, subd. (a)(1), (a)(4), 1 (a)(5)) , 10 counts of lewd act on a child under 14 (§ 288, subd. (a)), and six counts of lewd act on a child 14 or 15 years of age (§ 288, subd. (c)(1)). The court found true one-strike allegations (§ 667.61(d)) as to the lewd act on a child under 14 counts and two prior strike conviction allegations (§ 1170.12). Defendant was sentenced to 900…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.