Aries Security v. Mlodzianowski CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 2021C093275California5,496 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 12/27/21 Aries Security v. Mlodzianowski CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

ARIES SECURITY, LLC, C093275

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. PC20200292)

v.

JOSEPH MLODZIANOWSKI,

Defendant and Respondent.

This case arises out of a business dispute between a California resident and a Texas resident, who are the co-owners and sole members of a cyber security company, plaintiff Aries Security, LLC (Aries). Aries appeals from the order granting defendant Joseph Mlodzianowski’s motion to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Factual Background Aries is a limited liability company formed in 2008…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.