Anna Bjornsdotter v. Suttell & Hammer, P.S.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANNA M. BJORNSDOTTER, on behalf of No. 20-35298 herself and others similarly situated, 20-35503

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:18-cv-02079-MC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SUTTELL & HAMMER, P.S., FKA Suttell, Hammer & White, P.S.; PATRICK J.

LAYMAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge BUMATAY

Anna Bjornsdotter appeals from two district court judgments. First, she

appeals the district court’s summary judgment order in favor of Suttell & Hammer,

P.S. (“Suttell”), which found that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, or alternatively

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. issue preclusion, barred her first two claims, and that Bjornsdotter failed…