Kim

Kim v. Vivas CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 2021D078843California5,861 words

Opinion

Opinion

Guerrero, J.

Filed 12/27/21 Kim v. Vivas CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

EILLEN KIM et al., D078843

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. RIC1903489)

JOSEPH VIVAS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Irma Poole Asberry, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Chad A. Gerardi, Chad Anthony Gerardi; Thomas Vogele & Associates, Thomas A. Vogele and Timothy M. Kowal, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Demler, Armstrong & Rowland, Robert W. Armstrong and David A. Ring, for Defendants and Respondents. Chung Ho Kim died tragically after encountering two unleashed dogs while on an evening walk in a residential area. When one dog barked and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.