People v. Saucedo-Zepeda CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 28, 2021A160101California9,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 12/28/21 P. v. Saucedo-Zepeda CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A160101

v. ENRIQUE SAUCEDO-ZEPEDA, (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. SCN230061) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Enrique Saucedo-Zepeda appeals after a jury found him guilty of two counts of rape. On appeal, defendant argues: (1) the prosecutor engaged in misconduct; (2) defense counsel provided ineffective assistance; (3) insufficient evidence supported the verdicts; and (4) multiple errors caused cumulative prejudice. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The People charged defendant with rape of a person who was unconscious or asleep (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(4)(A),1 count I), and rape of a person who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.